WK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bill Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Workiva, Inc.'s net margin of -0.75%. Workiva, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Bill Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.31%.

Workiva, Inc. has a consensus price target of $106.27, signalling upside risk potential of 20.46%. On the other hand Bill Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $61.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.57%. Given that Workiva, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bill Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Workiva, Inc. is more attractive than Bill Holdings, Inc..

Workiva, Inc. has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.807% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bill Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.353, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.295%.

Workiva, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bill Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bill Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva, Inc. quarterly revenues are $224.2M, which are smaller than Bill Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $395.7M. Workiva, Inc.'s net income of $2.8M is higher than Bill Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3M. Notably, Workiva, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bill Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva, Inc. is 5.90x versus 3.79x for Bill Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft Corp. has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Workiva, Inc.'s net margin of 35.72%. Workiva, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 32.4%.

Workiva, Inc. has a consensus price target of $106.27, signalling upside risk potential of 20.46%. On the other hand Microsoft Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $622.51 which suggests that it could grow by 27.87%. Given that Microsoft Corp. has higher upside potential than Workiva, Inc., analysts believe Microsoft Corp. is more attractive than Workiva, Inc..

Workiva, Inc. has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.807% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.205%.

Workiva, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft Corp. offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Workiva, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp. pays out 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Workiva, Inc. quarterly revenues are $224.2M, which are smaller than Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues of $77.7B. Workiva, Inc.'s net income of $2.8M is lower than Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $27.7B. Notably, Workiva, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft Corp.'s PE ratio is 34.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva, Inc. is 5.90x versus 12.37x for Microsoft Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Q2 Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Workiva, Inc.'s net margin of 7.46%. Workiva, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.74%.

Workiva, Inc. has a consensus price target of $106.27, signalling upside risk potential of 20.46%. On the other hand Q2 Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.71 which suggests that it could grow by 21.01%. Given that Q2 Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Workiva, Inc., analysts believe Q2 Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Workiva, Inc..

Workiva, Inc. has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.807% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Q2 Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.375, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.479%.

Workiva, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Q2 Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Q2 Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva, Inc. quarterly revenues are $224.2M, which are larger than Q2 Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $201.7M. Workiva, Inc.'s net income of $2.8M is lower than Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $15M. Notably, Workiva, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 153.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva, Inc. is 5.90x versus 6.48x for Q2 Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday, Inc. has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Workiva, Inc.'s net margin of 10.38%. Workiva, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Workday, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.19%.

Workiva, Inc. has a consensus price target of $106.27, signalling upside risk potential of 20.46%. On the other hand Workday, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $275.88 which suggests that it could grow by 28.05%. Given that Workday, Inc. has higher upside potential than Workiva, Inc., analysts believe Workday, Inc. is more attractive than Workiva, Inc..

Workiva, Inc. has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.807% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday, Inc. has a beta of 1.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.195%.

Workiva, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva, Inc. quarterly revenues are $224.2M, which are smaller than Workday, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Workiva, Inc.'s net income of $2.8M is lower than Workday, Inc.'s net income of $252M. Notably, Workiva, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workday, Inc.'s PE ratio is 90.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva, Inc. is 5.90x versus 6.31x for Workday, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.